Apr 17
Posted: under Editing, Revisions, the writing life.
Tags: revision, the writing life, writer-as-editor April 17th, 2009
Final days of my work based on the editor’s notes. What left for NYC already a few thousand words shorter than it had been, is now almost 3000 words shorter than that…and you would not miss one of them. Well…maybe a half dozen, but you’d have to have read it before. How do editors and […] [...more]
Final days of my work based on the editor’s notes. What left for NYC already a few thousand words shorter than it had been, is now almost 3000 words shorter than that…and you would not miss one of them. Well…maybe a half dozen, but you’d have to have read it before.
How do editors and writers decide what to cut? Well…think of the classic example: Michelangelo saying that to make a statue all you do is cut away the stone that doesn’t belong. It’s much the same with words, though figuring out what doesn’t belong is a bit tougher. After all, if you’re carving a cube, and there’s this triangular lump sticking out one side…that doesn’t belong. If the “David” had chin-wattles, that wouldn’t belong. But with a story, especially the first of several that share a story arc…does the bit about the pony and the wildcat belong or not? (There was no bit about the pony and the wildcat: I just made that up. I made the whole thing up, but you know what I mean…)
Read the rest of this entry »
Apr 07
Posted: under Editing, Revisions, the writing life.
Tags: mistakes, process, revision, the writing life April 7th, 2009
When I looked at the one editorial request that I just could not make work, and then finally figured it out, I realized it was a perfect example for study. My editor correctly noted that the emotional high point of a relationship’s end was not at the end…there was an anticlimax scene. [...more]
When I looked at the one editorial request that I just could not make work, and then finally figured it out, I realized it was a perfect example for study. My editor correctly noted that the emotional high point of a relationship’s end was not at the end…there was an anticlimax scene.
Read the rest of this entry »
Apr 06
Posted: under Editing, Revisions, the writing life.
Tags: revision, the writing life April 6th, 2009
For the past week, I’ve been working on the revisions my editor sent me (in two parts), and it occurred to me that the process might be interesting to you. I can’t share exactly what my editor said, because since she and I both know what’s in the book, our communications are just about solid […] [...more]
For the past week, I’ve been working on the revisions my editor sent me (in two parts), and it occurred to me that the process might be interesting to you. I can’t share exactly what my editor said, because since she and I both know what’s in the book, our communications are just about solid Spoiler. But with a little judicious tweaking, I think I can give you a taste of the experience of being edited by an excellent editor, though it will reveal some of my weaknesses as a writer.
Editorial comments fall into three basic categories: the surface-level error…the structural glitch….the foundational/design disaster. Within quote marks is the original text; the comments outside quote marks are my editors, suitably trimmed to avoid spoilerish revelations. Square brackets are where I inserted a substitute, non-spoiler, filler.
Read the rest of this entry »